All Case Studies Production AI / RAG Architecture

Production RAG: Enterprise Document Intelligence with pgvector & Reranking

Why simple naive vector search fails in production, and how I built a deterministic, cited document intelligence engine using semantic chunking, PostgreSQL pgvector, cross-encoder reranking, and hallucination guardrails.

> 97%
Context Retrieval Accuracy
< 1.4s
End-to-End Latency
100%
Verbatim Source Citations
pgvector
Hybrid HNSW + Full-Text

The Real Problem with Naive RAG

Many organizations attempt RAG by taking standard 500-token chunks, pushing them into an isolated vector database, and expecting ChatGPT to synthesize flawless answers. In real-world enterprise documents (PDF tables, regulatory disclosures, multi-page legal contracts), this naive approach regularly hallucinates, loses critical context split across chunk boundaries, and produces untraceable answers.

Python (FastAPI) PostgreSQL (pgvector HNSW) OpenAI text-embedding-3-large Cohere Rerank / Cross-Encoder LangChain / LlamaIndex Next.js UI

Production Ingestion & Retrieval Pipeline

INGESTION PHASE: [Raw PDF / Legal Contract / Financial Report] │ [Document Parsing & Table Structure Reconstruction (Unstructured / PyMuPDF)] │ [Hierarchical Semantic Chunking (Parent-Child Windowing)] │ [Embedding Generation (OpenAI text-embedding-3-large - 1536 dim)] │ [PostgreSQL pgvector Table with HNSW Index & Metadata Filters] RETRIEVAL & GENERATION PHASE: [User Inquiry] │ [Hybrid Search Engine] ├── Vector Similarity (Cosine distance via pgvector HNSW) └── Lexical Keyword Match (PostgreSQL tsvector / tsquery) │ ▼ (Top 25 Candidate Chunks) [Cross-Encoder / Cohere Reranker Model] (Reduces to Top 5 High-Relevance Chunks) │ [Deterministic Prompt Assembler with Verbatim Citation Guardrails] │ [LLM Generation (GPT-4o / Claude 3.5 Sonnet)] ──> Output with Page/Paragraph Citations

Why PostgreSQL + pgvector instead of standalone Vector Stores?

Using PostgreSQL with the pgvector extension allowed us to perform hybrid relational + vector queries within a single ACID transaction. For example, filtering by tenant_id, department_id, and document_date before vector calculation prevented cross-client data leakage and avoided paying for multi-tool synchronization pipelines.

Hallucination Elimination & Guardrails

1. Two-Stage Retrieval with Cross-Encoder Reranking

Initial bi-encoder vector search retrieves the top 25 candidates quickly. A cross-encoder reranker then evaluates question-chunk token pairs deeply, eliminating semantic false positives and feeding only the 5 most authoritative excerpts to the context window.

2. Verbatim Footnote Attribution & Verification Loop

The system forces the model to cite exact document IDs, page numbers, and bounding-box coordinates for each claim. A lightweight validation regex inspects the response; if an assertion lacks source text within the retrieved chunk, the claim is rejected.

Production Impact

Achieved over 97% context retrieval precision on complex regulatory audit tests, slashing manual compliance review times from hours to under 2 seconds per query with full source traceability.

Integrating AI or RAG into your production software?

I build enterprise AI systems that deliver deterministic, cited results rather than unpredictable chat prototypes.

Discuss Your AI Initiative View All Case Studies
Discuss Your Project